Discuss the similarities and differences between ?new terrorism? and th

Pantha rei as it was stated by the Greek philosopher, Heraclites of Ephesus (sixth and fifth centuries B.C.) allthing flows, everything changes. Change in the modern world is an extremely fast process. Nothing remains the same as it was in the past. In political science especially, some notions (e.g. sovereignty) demand redefinition. The ever-changing nature of all things also includes the political concept of terrorism. The official access to this changing terrorism is rather complicated. The terrorist of yesterday is the hero of today, and the hero of yesterday becomes the terrorist of today . There is then a great need to know what contemporary terrorism is and what it is not. terrorist act is a calculated use of military group to achieve a political change, thus violence or as important, the threat of violence is used and directed in pursuit of, or in service of a political aim . Terrorism is an human face of political strategy, a entrustful choice made by an arran ging for political and strategic reasons (efficacy) rather than as the unintended outcome of mental or social factors . However, terrorism is difficult to define because the meaning of the depot has changed so frequently over the past 200 years. It has morphed from positive intension during the French Revolution (closely associated with the ideals of virtue and democracy ), through the revolutionary ordure and finally to a religiously motivated act as it is in general perceived today. Nevertheless, we shoot to ask ourselves whether grey-headed and novel terrorism actually exists, or maybe the phenomenon we are facing today reminds us an grey-headed wine in a new bottle.Two questions frame the discussed turn up 1.What is the nature of new terrorism?2.What is the magnitude of threat of new terrorism?Old and new terrorism are distinguishable in fiver points, as the table below shows .Old TerrorismNew TerrorismIdeologicalVague or religious motivationsHierarchicalUnorganized ( lone wolf, ad hoc) therefore much difficult to penetratePropaganda by deed (bringing edit out to the table)More violent (killing for the sake of killing)Sub-nationalTransnational and International (global... ...uld be considered more(prenominal) dangerous. The new rules of an old game make it more lethal and unpredictable. allow us examine only one example Nearly every terrorist group in Iraq has recently captured a foreigner but additionally, they have produced an accompanying video, where a list of demands is outlined, a deadline is set, hostages plea for their lives, and in several(prenominal) instances, they are killed by beheading. Then these kidnappings merge a technique of old terrorism in service of new style terrorism. Furthermore, now more than ever, the media are a tool of war. These dramas were broadcasted by the media all over the world. This is how the media helps to recrudesce terrorism they send the terrorist a clear although unspoken message to swan access t o the airwaves, you need to devise even more outrageous tactics. Thus, the new global terrorist, caught into the trap of globalization, will have to break more rules, amaze more psychological borders, and crack more taboos in order to exist. This foundation be considered the most dangerous feature of the new terrorism not only do we not know when the next attack will strike, we either have no idea what actually is going to hap .