Adverse Leadership Model

SOU 4 Adverse drawing cardship Model Jeff Mais Texas A & M University Commerce Introduction During this semester we brace looked at some(prenominal) autocratic loss attractionship theories, from the most elementary to the more complex. leadership takes on some(prenominal) different roles and responsibilities of both the leader and assistant. Some leaders have the essential ability to lead their chase successfully, however others crumbnot. Destructive leadership (Padilla et al, 2007) is much(prenominal) a theory that has been introduced with devastating follower outcomes. This could be viewed in several bearings a skinny leader with mediocre following or large(p) leader with good following.Bad or adverse leadership washstand affect the follower outcomes and last create a terrible shape environment for the chase. measly leaders hobo have a oppose impact on employees and might even damage the companys bottom line (Leviticus, 2010). In this paper we will pull a head judge the adverse leadership model in figure 1 and condone this model from the leader, follower, environment and outcomes. Adverse loss leadership Model The Adverse Leadership Model (ALM) is a model that focuses primarily around bad leaders and subservient followers.Looking at interpret 1, we will start with explaining the various characteristics of the bad leader scant(p) communicator, micromanager, sets un go past expectations, uses intimidation, and poor people skills. These 5 characteristics outline the bad leader and help create the poor environmental conditions controld further. * Poor Communication Poor leaders dont value colloquy with their employees. A poor leader might spend long periods of clip away from his desk or office or might ignore cater emails and telephone messages.Listening to others is a low priority, and poor leaders disregard infix from lag and might not seem to c atomic number 18 most staff opinions (Leviticus, 2010). * Micromanager Micro managers are very involved in the smallest details of the followers jobs and/or projects. This type of leader carriage can nurse followers feel inadequate at their jobs and it typically due to insecurities of the leader. * Sets Unclear Expectations helplessness to set clear expectations by the leader can frustrate followers and hinder their ability to be successful.A leader who doesnt set clear expectations might not give all of the details cerebrate to a project or suddenly move the due date creating a moving target for followers. * Uses Intimidation Leaders might intimidate or bully their followers. Workplace bullying has been an ongoing discussion in spite of appearance the nation of leadership. This type of behavior can decrease worker morale and ultimately could increase turnover. * Poor People Skills People skills are vital to congruous a great leader, however leaders can be controvert people who dont know how to motivate others.In addition, leaders with poor people skills cannot consider any other opinions but their own. Looking at the characteristics described above, they are all contradictory to the transformational leadership theory pose value into the followers opinions and helping employees complete their tasks. Often times the followers have characteristics that enable the leader to remain in an adverse leadership role. However, these followers might not understand how to recognize a good leader from a bad leader. Some of the characteristics include beginning self-esteem, Un ambitious, Low maturity, little or no core values, and disengaged. Low self-esteem following with low self-esteem might not have the skills necessary to acquaint a bullying leader or one that uses intimidation. * nonenterprising These followers have little drive and consider their current situation to be the best they will ever do. Having a follower that isnt ambitious would be easy for the transformational leader to motivate, due to their ability to engage t hem and make them part of something larger. * Low maturity Often times a follower with a bad leader can be young and immature, deficient both self-esteem and confidence.This makes it easier for the bad leader to intimidate and control the follower. * brusque or no core values The follower must have some kind of core values in order to be a successful leader. If they do not, then the leader can much times take advantage of this and exploit the followers weakness in order to remain in control. * Disengaged The disengaged follower treats their current position as a job. They are also known as clock punchers, simply there to collect a paycheck and are not discerning about the company in any way.Although these characteristics are not in demand(predicate) in a traditional leadership example, they make it easier for the adverse leader to thrive creating a chaotic environment for the workplace. As we further examine figure 1, we can see a direct line in the midst of the leader and follower, but no line back from the follower to the leader. This is because in the adverse leadership model, the leader is primarily a dictator and doesnt allow for a healthy leader-member exchange. This could be due to insecurities by the leader and fear of be out performed.Moving outside of the leader and follower characteristics, we can examine the environment created by this type of leadership. High stress, alienation, and segregation are all felt by the follower due to the dyadic consanguinity between the leader and follower. High stress can lead to break of serve of productivity amongst the team members and other health related issues. Creating a disallow atmosphere can backfire because fear can cause stress, and in extreme situations, reductions in performance and efficiency (Riggio, 2009).Alienation and segregation by the leader can also create a feeling of betrayal within followers this can also allow the members to form sub-groups that become further alienated from th e remaining followers. separatism amongst other team members removes the cohesive bring together that should be cultivated by the leader. Further studies by Liu et al. (2012), have revealed a direct correlation between bad leadership and follower creativity. The net portion of the adverse leadership model has to do with follower outcomes, slack and worthlessness.These outcomes are detrimental to the companys success, due to health related issues from depression alone. Approximately 18. 8 million American adults, or about 9. 5 percent of the U. S. population age 18 and older in a given year, have a depressive disorder (depressionperception. com). This doesnt include the other health related issues that could be a direct direct of working in a stressful environment. In addition to being depressed, followers might feel worthless due to intimidating behavior by the leader. This could also come from bullying by other co-workers who lease to emulate the leaders social cues.In conclus ion, bad leaders can only breed more bad leaders and the only way to stop it is to file complaints with HR or stand up to the bad leader, identifying issues the followers would like to change to be productive and work in a stress free environment. References Leviticus, J. (2010), The top signs of poor leadership. Retrieved from http//smallbusiness. chron. com/top-signs-poor-leadership-31537. html Liu, D. , Liao, H. , and Loi, R. (2012). The grisly side of leadership A three-level investigation of the cascading effect of abusive watchfulness on employee creativity.Academy of Management Journal, 55(5), 1187-1212. Padilla, A. , Hogan, R. and Kaiser, R. B. 2007, The toxic triangle destructive leaders, susceptible followers, and causative environments, The Leadership Quarterly, 18, 176194. Riggio, R. (2009), How to spot a bad leader. Retrieved from http//www. psychologytoday. com/blog/cutting-edge-leadership/200905/how-spot-bad-leader Adverse Leadership Model Figure 1 Adverse Leaders hip Model Figure 1 Adverse Leadership Model Environment * High extend * Alienation * Segregation Environment * High Stress * Alienation * Segregation retainer Outcomes . Depression 2. Worthlessness Follower Outcomes 3. Depression 4. Worthlessness Follower Characteristics 1. Low Self-Esteem 2. Unambitious 3. Low Maturity 4. Little or No Core value 5. Disengaged Follower Characteristics 6. Low Self-Esteem 7. Unambitious 8. Low Maturity 9. Little or No Core Values 10. Disengaged Leader Characteristics 1. Poor Communicator 2. Micromanager 3. Sets Unclear Expectations 4. Uses Intimidation 5. Poor People Skills Leader Characteristics 6. Poor Communicator 7. Micromanager 8. Sets Unclear Expectations 9. Uses Intimidation 10. Poor People Skills