COMPARISONOF MILITARY LEADERSHIP THROUGHOUT THE AGES Essay -- essays r

COMPARISONOF MILITARY LEADERSHIP THROUGHOUT THE AGESNo loss attracter should put troops into the field merely to gratify his own short temper no leader should fight a battle simply show up of pique. But a kingdom that has once been destroyed can never come again into being nor can the dead ever be brought back to life. Hence the enlightened leader is heedful, and the good leader is unspoiled of caution.- sunbathe Tzu IntroductionTommy Franks, general of the American Army states that soldeirs should check a high competance in their workplace, are caring, direct to their peers and sub-ordinates, hard and tough in all conditions, thoughtful to the concourse of all and most importantly a leader. He states You would have to be a coward if you were a commander and you were non afraid for your men. Understanding that statement leaders is not the identical in all levels. Majors and Leuitenant Colenels are not leading a section into battle, but on the flip side you dont see a lance corporal moving battalions stragecally over the battlefield. This is the detail that leaders of all levels sometimes forget, that everyone in the army is a leader of some respect.Although there are obviously some(prenominal) inspiring leaders, although the quest leaders chosen have different appraoaches to the way that they led their country. These leaders show the way that you can bring a country from forte to strength with leaders skills. These include the up and down life of Sadaam Hussein, enjoyment and loss of Adolf Hitler, the coming from nothing to the conquering Napoleon and finally the simile of the great to the poor leaders.This essay will enlighten the issues of leadership of wellspring known leaders and compare them with the text leader from the Australian shoot of veiw. It will also bring current leaders into a lieu to compare them with the leaders of yesteryear and provide an argument where they may have gone wrong.What is a leader?Australian Defence force de finiton of leadership is leadership is the continuous influencing and directing of men in tasks which they accomplish their unstrained obedience, confidence, respect and loyalty in the manner urged by the leader. Qualities of leadership affect leading by example with the use of the following traits Motivation, Courage physical and moral, Decisiveness, Responsibility, iniative, integrity, judgement, knowledge, loyalty, selflessness ... ...e and has no integrity. Saddam did show a lot of initative though, ordinance his armies into neighbouring countries and conquering them. On the other hand Napoleon and Alexander the huge are very similar in their leadership traits. This is because Napolean studied many battles of Alexander and moulded himself to act like the leaders of that era. Alexander was the break by means of of technology with the long bow and cavalry, where as Napoleon proved Sun Tzu 1963, The Art of War (translated by S. Griffith), Oxford University Press, London, p. 10 Most influential people of the world dor 2003. 2030 9th Jan 2004 Channel 10as higher upLeadership opening and Practice - greenas aboveSmall Unit leadershipRitter, S. and Riverspit, W. 2002, War on Iraq What team Bush doesnt want you to know, stage setting Books, New York p. 5Harris, B. 2003, uniform resource locator www.moreorless.au.com/killers/hussein.htm Ritter,Brevic, M 1999, Warfare Alexander the Great, digital Attack p. 2URLhttp//www.pvv.ntnu.no/madsb/home/war/alex/ General Failings URLhttp//www.insead.fr/mauborgne/newsppracticles/FT/FT%20General%20Failings%20061202.htmas aboveas aboveas aboveas aboveas aboveBrevikas aboveas aboveBrevic